recombinant human fabp4 (R&D Systems)
Structured Review

Recombinant Human Fabp4, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 2 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant human fabp4/product/R&D Systems
Average 93 stars, based on 2 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Endothelial-derived FABP4 constitutes the majority of basal circulating hormone and regulates lipolysis-driven insulin secretion."
Article Title: Endothelial-derived FABP4 constitutes the majority of basal circulating hormone and regulates lipolysis-driven insulin secretion.
Journal: JCI insight
doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.164642
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 1. Validation of tissue-specific deletion of FABP4 from adipocytes. (A) Representative immunoblots (n = 2) and quantification of FABP4 protein relative to β-tubulin loading control in perirenal adipose tissue of WT, Adipo-KO, Endo-KO, and Total-KO mice. WT, Total-KO: n = 5/group; Adipo-KO, Endo-KO: n = 6/group. (B) Immunoblots and quantification of FABP4 protein relative to β-tubulin loading control in perirenal adipose tissue of WT and Myeloid-KO mice. n = 5/group. (C) Representative FABP4 immunostaining in perigonadal adipose tissue from WT, Adipo-KO, Endo-KO, and Total-KO mice. Magnification, 400×. (D) Immunoblots and quantification of FABP4 protein relative to β-tubulin loading control in isolated perigonadal adipocytes of WT, Adipo-KO, Endo-KO, and Total-KO mice. WT, Adipo-KO, Endo-KO: n = 5/group; Total-KO: n = 1. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 by 1-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison test (A and D), or by t test (B). ND, no signal detected.
Techniques Used: Biomarker Discovery, Western Blot, Control, Immunostaining, Isolation, Comparison
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 2. Validation of tissue-specific deletion of FABP4 from endothelial cells. (A) Immunoblots and quantification of FABP4 protein relative to β-tubulin loading control in CD31-isolated endothelial cells from liver, spleen, heart, and lungs of WT, Adipo-KO, and Endo-KO mice. n = 2/group. (B) Representative FABP4 immunostaining in livers of WT, Adipo-KO, Endo-KO, and Myeloid-KO mice; magnification, 200×. ND, no signal detected.
Techniques Used: Biomarker Discovery, Western Blot, Control, Isolation, Immunostaining
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 3. Endothelial cells contribute to approximately 87% of basal circulating FABP4 during 6-hour daytime fasting. (A) Plasma FABP4 levels in lean WT (n = 43), Adipo-KO (n = 29), Endo-KO (n = 29), and Total-KO (n = 23) male mice. Data are pooled from 5 experiments. Average age of mice is 13 weeks old. Immunoblots of perirenal and mesenteric adipose FABP4 protein expression, for comparison with plasma levels. (B) Plasma FABP4 levels in WT versus Myeloid-KO mice. Data are pooled from 2 experiments, n = 8/group/experiment. (C) Plasma FABP5 levels in WT, Adipo-KO, Endo-KO, and Total-KO mice. n = 8/group. All samples were collected from male mice after 6-hour daytime food withdrawal. *P < 0.05, ****P < 0.0001 by unpaired t test (B) or by 1-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison test (A and C).
Techniques Used: Clinical Proteomics, Western Blot, Expressing, Comparison
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 4. Lipolysis-driven FABP4 secretion is primarily from adipocytes. (A–E) Plasma FABP4 levels, baseline-corrected plasma FABP4, AUC of baseline-corrected plasma FABP4, nonesterified fatty acid (NEFA), and glycerol responses to 10 mg/kg isoproterenol-induced lipolysis in ~13-week- old WT (n = 54), Adipo-KO (n = 40), Endo-KO (n = 34), and Total-KO (n = 8 for FABP4, n = 15 for NEFA, glycerol) mice. Data for A–E are pooled from 6 experiments. (F–H) NEFA, glycerol, and FABP4 responses to FSK-induced lipolysis in perigonadal adipose explants from WT, Adipo-KO, and Endo-KO mice; n = 4/group. Data are normalized to amount of adipose tissue per culture well. (I) Plasma FABP4 responses to 10 mg/kg isoproterenol-induced lipolysis in WT and Myeloid-KO mice; n = 8/group. (J) WT versus Adipo Endo-KO mice with deletion of FABP4 in both adipocytes and endothelial cells; n = 6/group. All experiments were in male mice. ****P < 0.0001, ***P < 0.001, ** P <0.01, *P < 0.05 versus WT; °°°°P < 0.0001, °°°P < 0.001, °°P < 0.01, °P < 0.05 versus Endo-KO; •P < 0.05 versus Adipo-KO, by mixed-effects analysis followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison test (A, B, D, and E), or 2-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s (F, G, and H) or Sidak’s (I and J) multiple-comparison test. ****P < 0.0001, ** P <0.01 by 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison test (C). ND, no signal detected.
Techniques Used: Clinical Proteomics, Comparison
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 5. Endothelial and adipocyte FABP4 secretion are differentially regulated. (A) Twelve-hour conditioned media FABP4 levels from CD31-isolated endothelial cells from liver, heart, and lungs of WT, Adipo-KO, and Endo-KO mice, normalized to total cellular protein; n = 3 mice/group. (B and C) FABP4 levels in HUVEC lysates and 5-hour conditioned media, normalized to total cellular protein at days 3 through 14 after seeding. Pool of 2 exper- iments; n = 6/time point. (D) Time-course of cumulative FABP4 levels in media of day 7 HUVECs; n = 4/time point. Inset: Media lactate dehydroge- nase (LDH) levels during the same time course. °°°°P < 0.0001, °°°P < 0.001 versus 0 hours by 1-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple-com- parison test. (E) Effects of the ER-Golgi pathway inhibitor, brefeldin A (BFA), on FABP4 and endothelin-1 (ET-1) secretion from day 11 HUVECs; n = 3/ BFA dose. (F) Effects of forskolin (FSK) on FABP4 secretion in HUVECs versus 3T3-L1 adipocytes. n = 3/FSK dose. *P < 0.05 versus HUVEC by 2-way ANOVA followed by Sidak’s multiple-comparison test. (G) Effects of FSK on FABP4 and von Willebrand Factor (vWF) secretion from day 11 HUVECs. FABP4, n = 4/FSK dose; vWF, n = 3/FSK dose. (H) Total FABP4 measured by ELISA in HUVEC cell lysates (CL), conditioned media (CM), and exosomes (Exos) isolated from CM; n = 3. (I) Western blots of FABP4, exosome markers CD-63 and ALiX, and double-membrane protein β-actin in HUVEC cell lysates, conditioned media, and exosomes. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001 by 1-way ANOVA followed by Sidak’s (A), Tukey’s (B, C, and H), or Dunnett’s (E and G) multiple-comparison test.
Techniques Used: Isolation, Comparison, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Western Blot, Membrane
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 6. Lipolysis-driven insulin secretion is blunted in mice lacking endothelial but not adipocyte FABP4. (A) Plasma insulin responses to 10 mg/ kg isoproterenol-induced lipolysis in WT (n = 52), Adipo-KO (n = 40), Endo-KO (n = 34), and Total-KO (n = 15) mice. Data are pooled from 6 experiments. (B) Plasma insulin responses to 10 mg/kg isoproterenol-induced lipolysis in WT versus Myeloid-KO mice; n = 8/group. (C and D) Blood glucose levels in response to 10 mg/kg isoproterenol-induced lipolysis in WT versus Endo-KO mice (n = 10/group) and in WT (n = 7) versus Adipo-KO (n = 10) mice. (E and F) Plasma FAPB4 and insulin responses in WT and Fabp4–/– mice injected with PBS or 7 μg of FABP4 prior to induction of lipolysis with 10 mg/kg isoprotere- nol; n = 8/group. All experiments were in male mice. ****P < 0.0001, ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05 versus WT; °°°°P < 0.0001, °°°P < 0.001, °P < 0.05 versus Adipo-KO, by mixed-effects analysis, followed by Tukey’s (A and F) or Sidak’s (C and E) multiple-comparison test, or 2-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison test (B and D). ND, no signal detected.
Techniques Used: Clinical Proteomics, Injection, Comparison
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 7. Pancreas endothelial cells express FABP4, and Endo-KO islets show altered regulation of insulin secretion. (A) Upper panel: Representative FABP4 immunostaining of pancreas of WT, Adipo-KO, Endo-KO, and Myeloid-KO mice. Islets are encircled by black dotted lines. Magnification, 400×. Low- er panel: 2× enlargement of boxed area in upper panel. (B) Representative insulin immunostaining of pancreas from WT, Adipo-KO, Endo-KO, and Total-KO mice; magnification, 80×. (C) Quantification of insulin-positive area. Pool of 2 experiments. WT: n = 5; Adipo-KO, Endo-KO, Total-KO: n = 6/group. (D) Insulin secretion from isolated islets of WT, Adipo-KO, Endo-KO, and Total-KO mice in response to low glucose (LG, 2.8 mM), high glucose (HG, 16.7 mM), HG + forskolin (FSK, 10 μM), and HG + KCl (30 mM). Insulin secretion is normalized to cellular DNA. LG, HG: n = 4/group. HG + FSK or KCl: n = 3/group. (E) Fold-increase in insulin secretion induced by HG + FSK (10 μM) over HG from 7D. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 by 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s (C and E) or Dunnett’s (D) multiple-comparison test. HG Endo-KO is P < 0.05 by t test (D).
Techniques Used: Immunostaining, Isolation, Comparison
